<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Registration-free COM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grootveld.com/archives/16/registration-free-com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grootveld.com/archives/16/registration-free-com</link>
	<description>But I digress...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnout</title>
		<link>http://grootveld.com/archives/16/registration-free-com/comment-page-1#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grootveld.com/archives/16#comment-473</guid>
		<description>Rami,

Sorry, took me a while to find the time to look at this. 

I&#039;ve never used it before, but there&#039;s an &lt;a href=&#039;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms973913.aspx#rfacomwalk_topic9&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Activation Context API&lt;/a&gt;. Using that API, you can explicitly control which manifest file (or resource) to use, instead of having Windows default to &lt;i&gt;appname&lt;/i&gt;.exe.manifest.

I built a quick test project, and that worked nicely (note that the sample code on MSDN seems to lack a call to ReleaseActCtx() &#8212; not sure how important that is, but still). I assume this would work as well from a WinUnit test DLL, but I didn&#039;t try that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rami,</p>
<p>Sorry, took me a while to find the time to look at this. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never used it before, but there&#8217;s an <a href='http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms973913.aspx#rfacomwalk_topic9' rel="nofollow">Activation Context API</a>. Using that API, you can explicitly control which manifest file (or resource) to use, instead of having Windows default to <i>appname</i>.exe.manifest.</p>
<p>I built a quick test project, and that worked nicely (note that the sample code on MSDN seems to lack a call to ReleaseActCtx() &mdash; not sure how important that is, but still). I assume this would work as well from a WinUnit test DLL, but I didn&#8217;t try that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rami AbuGhazaleh</title>
		<link>http://grootveld.com/archives/16/registration-free-com/comment-page-1#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Rami AbuGhazaleh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grootveld.com/archives/16#comment-472</guid>
		<description>Hi Arnout,

I am wondering if this is possible without creating an application manifest?

My scenario is different in that I am using a third party test runner exe, winunit.exe.

Any ideas?

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Arnout,</p>
<p>I am wondering if this is possible without creating an application manifest?</p>
<p>My scenario is different in that I am using a third party test runner exe, winunit.exe.</p>
<p>Any ideas?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

